<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why talking about Communism matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters</link>
	<description>A bug in the code of the universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: db0</title>
		<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/comment-page-1#comment-47093</link>
		<dc:creator>db0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 07:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbzer0.com/?p=2530#comment-47093</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re mistaken. There&#039;s quite a bunch of mutualists around (some even admins) and there&#039;s no banination going on. Certainly you will see how much other people agreed/disagreed with your comment but generally as long as you&#039;re not outright advocating statism or capitalism, you don&#039;t get downvoted (and I disagree with downvotes even in that case) 
 
OTOH, the FotLL have very little anarchists from the social perspective it seems to me (otherwise you wouldn&#039;t have asked me to come and comment on the anti-anarcho-communist thread). 
 
So everything has a bit of a bias, but by neutral I mostly meant a place where the banhammer can&#039;t fall just because an admin disagrees with you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;re mistaken. There&#039;s quite a bunch of mutualists around (some even admins) and there&#039;s no banination going on. Certainly you will see how much other people agreed/disagreed with your comment but generally as long as you&#039;re not outright advocating statism or capitalism, you don&#039;t get downvoted (and I disagree with downvotes even in that case) </p>
<p>OTOH, the FotLL have very little anarchists from the social perspective it seems to me (otherwise you wouldn&#039;t have asked me to come and comment on the anti-anarcho-communist thread). </p>
<p>So everything has a bit of a bias, but by neutral I mostly meant a place where the banhammer can&#039;t fall just because an admin disagrees with you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/comment-page-1#comment-47011</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbzer0.com/?p=2530#comment-47011</guid>
		<description>By the way, reddit is not a &quot;neutral ground.&quot; I&#039;ve been there a few times and it&#039;s pretty much communist territory. Very few LLers, MAers or capitalists. In a debate between capitalists and communists, I&#039;d propose the left-libertarian forum as a neutral ground. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://libertarianleft.freeforums.org/index.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://libertarianleft.freeforums.org/index.php&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, reddit is not a &quot;neutral ground.&quot; I&#039;ve been there a few times and it&#039;s pretty much communist territory. Very few LLers, MAers or capitalists. In a debate between capitalists and communists, I&#039;d propose the left-libertarian forum as a neutral ground.<br />
<a href="http://libertarianleft.freeforums.org/index.php" target="_blank">http://libertarianleft.freeforums.org/index.php</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/comment-page-1#comment-47009</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbzer0.com/?p=2530#comment-47009</guid>
		<description>I`m ready to be challenged. Why else would I be reading your blog? However so far I&#039;ve found about 95% agreement and very little to disagree about. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`m ready to be challenged. Why else would I be reading your blog? However so far I&#039;ve found about 95% agreement and very little to disagree about. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T_W</title>
		<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/comment-page-1#comment-46590</link>
		<dc:creator>T_W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 23:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbzer0.com/?p=2530#comment-46590</guid>
		<description>Conflating Darwin and Communist population control programs? Interesting fail. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conflating Darwin and Communist population control programs? Interesting fail. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db0</title>
		<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/comment-page-1#comment-46454</link>
		<dc:creator>db0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbzer0.com/?p=2530#comment-46454</guid>
		<description>You may be a troll but you talk about a common misconception of the US religious right. So I think you warrant a response, even though you&#039;re unlikely to listen. 
 
1) Atheists and Communists are not two different groups of people. Being one does not exclude the other, but nor does it require it. In fact, you&#039;ll find a small group of Atheists who are rabidly anti-communists, and you&#039;ll also find a majority of them being content with the current system.  
 
However it is true that most Communists are atheists, but that is not because the later causes the former, but because those who are antiauthoritarian generally find the concept of a &quot;Lord&quot; in the sky repulsive. And the lack of evidence towards it does not hurt either. 
 
2) Communists killing 150 million in the last century, I don&#039;t know where you get your figures, but to get such numbers you&#039;d have to apply the label of Communist very liberally. In such a case, one can consider that &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/confessionsofamarxist.blogspot.com\/2009\/03\/communism-has-killed-100-million.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;pro-Capitalists have killed about 170 mil&lt;/a&gt;.  
 
Of course, counting the dead is not an argument for either system. And of course I refute your liberal application of the label &quot;Communist&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be a troll but you talk about a common misconception of the US religious right. So I think you warrant a response, even though you&#039;re unlikely to listen. </p>
<p>1) Atheists and Communists are not two different groups of people. Being one does not exclude the other, but nor does it require it. In fact, you&#039;ll find a small group of Atheists who are rabidly anti-communists, and you&#039;ll also find a majority of them being content with the current system.  </p>
<p>However it is true that most Communists are atheists, but that is not because the later causes the former, but because those who are antiauthoritarian generally find the concept of a &quot;Lord&quot; in the sky repulsive. And the lack of evidence towards it does not hurt either. </p>
<p>2) Communists killing 150 million in the last century, I don&#039;t know where you get your figures, but to get such numbers you&#039;d have to apply the label of Communist very liberally. In such a case, one can consider that <a href="http:\/\/confessionsofamarxist.blogspot.com\/2009\/03\/communism-has-killed-100-million.html" target="_blank">pro-Capitalists have killed about 170 mil</a>.  </p>
<p>Of course, counting the dead is not an argument for either system. And of course I refute your liberal application of the label &quot;Communist&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawkinswatch</title>
		<link>http://dbzer0.com/blog/why-talking-about-communism-matters/comment-page-1#comment-46374</link>
		<dc:creator>dawkinswatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbzer0.com/?p=2530#comment-46374</guid>
		<description>Well here we are we find the unholy alliance between the Atheists and the communists, despite the fact that communism is responsible for killing 150 million peple in the last century. 
 
I have blamed Charles Darwin for the communist population control programs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here we are we find the unholy alliance between the Atheists and the communists, despite the fact that communism is responsible for killing 150 million peple in the last century. </p>
<p>I have blamed Charles Darwin for the communist population control programs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.175 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1138/1151 objects using disk: basic

Served from: dbzer0.com @ 2012-05-24 20:50:38 -->
