It seems that my latest post refuting the Austian refutation of Marxist exploitation theory has been noticed by none other than the official mises.org blog. The reaction was only to be expected.
I provide to you a sample of AnCap civility for your amusement 😉
This guy admits he’s no economic or marxist sholar, yet he’s calling our theorist hollow!? What a moron!
No, I said that your system sounds hollow. Learn to read?
He also has a laughable article on his site trying to debunk Rothbard’s “Egalitarianism as a Revolt against Nature”
The only laughable thing about this article is Rothbard himself really. What a douchebag.
Yawn. Another crank. Let him “refute” to his heart’s content. Just more nonsense to ignore for me
Not bored enough to write a comment about it obviously. But I also got the crank title at least.
Like most marxoids dedicated to proving that capitalism is evil because if the worker didn’t work for a wage the worker would starve, the role of the people who actually sell food is mysteriously overlooked.
Marxoid? Ok Misoid, I do not ovelook the role of people who sell food at all. If they are the intermediary for selling the item, then they simply pay the worker for the food he produced. Their labour is the act of selling and they should get to keep the full suplus value they create with that.
In short, this moron does not know what he is talking about.
Thank you. Hugs and kisses back.
The site also seems to have been designed to make reading a chore, irritating like chalk on a blackboard.
Does my mother smell of Elderberries too?
Who gives a damn if some commie loser wastes his time jostling with chimaeras he made up?
So there you have it. And this is simply the product of half a night’s gnashing of teeth. I can’t wait to see what more beautiful gems of indignation I’m going to receive.
All is not bad though, I already had 2 civil comments so there is hope that not all AnCaps are twats. Nevertheless, I’m glad I put up my warning to them yesterday. It might reduce the number of inane comments I get.